It is beyond doubt that the global food supply has incessantly become reliant on scientific food production procedures with enormous emphasis on the applications of genetic restructuring methodologies. Numerous literary pieces agree that the global agricultural and food production technologies are almost entirely dependent on genetic modifications. The outcomes of such reported molecular contractual modifications are products that have enormous applications in the present production methodologies within the global agricultural and food processing segments. Emerging reports suggest that the U.S. is amid the hugely affected nations with characteristic widespread applications of such methodologies. Statistical records indicate that slightly over 70% of all foods, consumed within the U.S., are products of genetically assemblage techniques. The multinational corporation, Monsanto, has emerged as the principal supplier of these techniques. This paper attempts to analyses the ways, in which genetically tailored products are threatening the global food security. In particular, it assesses the roles, played by Monsanto, in regard to this threat.
The Concept of GM Foods
From the recent debates, it is evident that the key developments within the food industry are the continued deficient legal frameworks that exclusively dictate the varied applications of GM foods. Robin (102) observes that there has been a persistent inclusion of ingredients with GM contents in various food assemblage points across the nation. Reportedly, the past years has witnessed the inclusion of GM components in outlets that were until hitherto considered haven for organic yields. Evidently, such public proclamation of GM infringements have only acted to further fuel calls for legislations that would assist in discerning amid the two food divisions. Low (236) suggests that issues, regarding discriminative branding of such products, remain a thorny issue with the evident public suspicion incrementing over the government’s reluctance to sanction such acts. Reportedly, while numerous nations have initiated such guidelines, the U.S. remains adamant amid growing concerns about the dangers such food types are posing to the mostly unsuspecting populace.
In his defense of macrobiotic foods, Pollan (132) suggest that several issues make GM products unsafe for human utilization. Furthermore, they pose a critical danger to the future of the global food production. Agreeably, optimal health systems (2) suggest that the consequences of pollen from GM crops remain a source of health hazard to the wellness of such innate life forms as butterflies and bees. Correspondingly, these food types pose greater danger to human life as well as steady destruction of ecological setup. Hatz (2009) suggests that given the recent outcries, regarding genetics technologies combined with credible revelations, regarding these ills, the global population is increasingly at risks of the consequences of GM products.
Monsanto and its Effects
Low (237) suggests that Monsanto is arguably the most influential global producer of varied agrochemicals and genetically restructured produce. However, while it has become prominent with its excellent technological advancements in agrochemicals, its responsibility to ecological stability and human wellness remains deplorable. Low (237) observes that over the past decades, the institution has had an increasingly unsatisfactory environmental responsibility. He cites the instance product DDT in the seventies that was extensively destructive to the environment. Reportedly, its capacity to find residence in an organism’s fat cells enabled it to restructure itself and subsequently enhance its effects.
Low (237) observes that the net effects of the chemical included reduced hatch rates for birds, while amongst humans it caused an assortment of predicaments. These included numerous cases of miscarriages, cancerous effects as well as serious impairment of the human sensory mechanisms. Reportedly, other merchandise from the organization such as PCBs elicited similar consequences in the various areas of its applications. Discriminate dumping from the organization’s production units resulted in enormous destruction of aquatic life forms.
Robin (102) observes that varied products from the multinational continue to cause huge ecological impairments. He cites the extensive utilization of roundup, which became a critical herbicide across numerous agricultural outposts. Reportedly, its biodegradability claim was the first defect discovered, followed by enormous destructive effects on the environment. Robin (102) reports that studies, conducted to investigate such claims, culminated in shocking discoveries that amid other things stated enormous effects of the chemical on placental cells given its higher cellular penetrability. The conclusion was a net effect that was disruptive to human reproduction amid other enormous ecological effects.
Given this backdrop, it is surprising that a technology with such a capacity to evoke such enormous ecological predicaments remains hugely uncontrolled. While there are numerous enlightening explanations, the incessant population expansion across the globe and its subsequent persistent need for food has played a significant role. According to Robin (106), the solution, presented by Monsanto by its dissimilar merchandises, remains a critical tool in finding the answer to the food predicament. Robin (106) observes that proponents of GM techniques suggest that with the enormous pressur exerted on existing resources by the persistently expanding populace, GM techniques presents a critical solution.
Evidently, with its bacterial toxin technologies, Monsanto has positioned itself as a key player in food production for the marauding human populace. However, opponents have persistently continued to express the discomfort with the technologies, citing their inability to ensure ecological safety and stability. Consequences of such resultant biotic procedures such as cross-pollination and GM products remain unknown, while their effects on both human and other organisms as well as the environment are evidently catastrophic.
Hatz (2009) suggests that inadequate guidelines on GM produce amid their incessant proliferation into the American market remains a thorny issue. Pollan (135) argues that the respective bodies, concerned with regulations of food, are increasingly insensitive to the effects of gene alterations in food crops. He suggests that public admissions by the concerned authorities that there is dismal dissimilarity amid the two food crops had its basis on political reasoning, rather than conclusive scientific examinations of facts.
Consequently, their admission and subsequent classification of the products as GRAS, generally recognized as safe, defined specific that are in dissimilar ways contradictory to the present GM ( genetically modified) foodstuffs. Robin (107) agrees that GM food crops were deficient in their scientific definition and the necessary criterion for a classification as a GRAS. Firstly, it is deficient of the overwhelming scientific acceptance, required of such technologies, secondly, they lack an expansive peer reviewed publications that substantiate such discoveries, (Robin 106). In light of this, the techniques are evidently illegal. It is, thus, surprising such techniques continue to exist.
Solutions to the GM Foodstuff Saga
From the forgoing discussion, it is evident that GM products continue to engulf expansive marketplaces within the U.S. and other nations across the globe. With its unwarranted support from the state, both locally and abroad, the technique remains a thorny issue. Writers like Pollan (135) openly disagree with these new techniques and suggest a variety of emerging health issues as consequences of these conditions. Obesity as well as other chronic disorders is reportedly on the increase because of these new products.
In his book, Pollan (135) suggests that the solution to the present predicament lies in the principle of eating innate foodstuffs, moderate consumption and insistence on planting crops. Reportedly, the edibles, presently consumed by individuals, are the results of elaborate scientific processing that cause insufficient nutrient balance. He suggests that macrobiotic products exhibit all the essential minerals that are beneficial to humans. Additionally, optimal eating is beneficial as it limits overeating effects such as obesity.
Hatz (2009) reports that European nations have conducted studies that have identified genetically induced additives as consequential because they increase the risks of cancerous developments amid other issues like improper body function. Reportedly, the gene deformations, associated with the GM techniques, were responsible to higher hormone conditions, culminating into a restructured chemical construct. When ingested, they conjured similar responses culminating into critical anomalies.
Optimal health systems (3) agree that the procedure that culminates in the creation of GM foodstuffs is a mutational procedure. Reportedly, this has an inherent capacity to initiate such deformities within humans. Evidently, there are critical issues, surrounding the cultivation, processing as well the usage of GM products. In the backdrop of inadequate acceptance of the procedures, it is imperative to conduct more research to discuss the suggested evils in the new technology. However, given the present conditions, the varied technologies, employed by Monsanto, have the capacity to wipe out the present macrobiotic foodstuffs through the already reported cross-pollination with their terminating GM products. Similarly, the health defects discussed have the capacity to cause unprecedented harm to the entire human populace.
This paper has established that there are critical issues with the GM foodstuffs that require expansive exploratory studies. As a giant in this field, Monsanto has had a prolonged history of critical disregards to ecological safety as well as the overall wellness of both human and other occupying organism. Furthermore, they present a capacity to cause unprecedented harm to the entire human populace. Like the other nations, the U.S. should relax its stance on GM produce and sanction labeling these products in groceries. Furthermore, the government should carry out scientific examinations and offer scientifically motivated explanations deficient in political intonations.