close
15%OFF

your 1st custom essay order

15discount is your discount code
Order now
← InteractionismThe Marriages →

Buy Gay Marriages essay paper online

Gay marriage is a socially and legally recognized marriage precisely between two people of the same social gender or biological sex. Same-sex marriage is a political, social, civil rights, moral, and religious issue particularly in many nations. The conflict arises well over as to whether gay couples should be allowed to finally enter into marriage, or have rights to it their own way. A related issue is as to whether the term "gay marriage" is to be accepted in all avenues of life and across the globe (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). There have been regions where gay marriages remain legal while others are struggling to legalize the practice with arguments as to why, when and how the gay marriages should be legalized.  Opposition to gay marriage arises from a rejection of the relative use of the word "marriage" as in the application of same-sex couples or objections regarding the legal as well as social status of marriage applied under the terminology. Other reasons why there are still contentions against gay marriages include religious beliefs, social consequences of gay marriages, tradition and parenting concerns. This paper in an argument and a reflection of the thesis, Gay marriages should be legalized (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009).

Gay marriages still stand as a hot button topic across the globe. State court systems across the globe for instance Massachusetts and New Jersey are considering cases perpetually to determine whether to legalize gay unions (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). Senator Tom Daschle and President Bush were the first in the United States among many politicians, to state opposition against legalizing gay marriage (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009). However, looking into their arguments, there is no justification of clear reason why gay marriages should not be legalized because they only base on their emotions and cultural elements a well as religious affiliations (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). The Vatican has also been on the limelight of launching new initiatives to oppose gay marriage under the religious backgrounds. With such oppositions of gay marriages, the question remains as to whether the gay marriages should be legalized, but I stand ground that they should be legal (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009).

Support for gay marriage often basis upon the universal human rights issue. According to the declaration of the rights, every human being has a right to freedom that means that an individual has the freedom to choose the partner without discriminating on sex or any other attributes (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009). It is therefore just to allow gay marriages under the clause that disallowing the marriages would be infringing on individual rights (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). No human being is subject to special treatment no matter the status of relationship, it is arguable that whether gay or heterosexual, everyone has a right to live the way he wants (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009). Under no circumstances should the right be, denied to a person no matter the reason or justification.

As the years progress, it is becoming increasingly clear that many traditional relationships actually are outdated (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009). After the introduction of the Civil Rights Movement, gay couples gradually moved into the limelight and fighting for equal rights of which they are entitled to, just like the heterosexual couples (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). No one can dispute the fact that rights are in discriminatory and cut on both ends not caring who has the right to what but giving everyone a chance to make a choice (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009).

According to the reports by ACLU, in 1998 January anti-gay marriage laws were relatively passed across 25 states. However, they were blocked in 24 in the United States (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009). Hawaii did not actually pass the laws until November of last year, when a bill allowing gay marriages came to be, allowing the legality and validation of gay marriages (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). Homophobia has been the main contention of the many states rejecting gay marriages sweeping across the states with ideas of heterosexists’ ideas and discriminating against the gay relationships (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009).

A common argument against gay marriage is tradition. Basing on arguments on traditions, it is apparent that many traditions have the values and norms, which they hold for long and base on staunch man to woman marriages (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). The traditions have practiced a routine since ancient times and seem to stick to the practices. The practices portray heterosexuality as the only sound and moral marriage (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009). However, they deem gay marriages as immoral and against the customs. Not even can these marriages feature in the traditions because anyone practicing it would be an enemy of the entire society as they view this as a taboo (David, 2004; Mark, 2007; Time, 2003). Sticking to the traditions is not bad because it helps in morals of the society; however, this is not reason enough to stop gay marriages. We are in the 21st century where changes are in every avenue of life. If we take it literally that the communities across the globe still stick to traditions, then there would be no changes experienced in life for instance technology (ACLU, 1998; Darren, 2006; Jonathan, 2004; Scott, 2009).

Buy Gay Marriages essay paper online

Related essays

  1. The Marriages
  2. Procreation
  3. Interactionism
  4. Market Strategy