15%OFF

your 1st custom essay order

15discount is your discount code
Order now
← Chesapeake ColoniesWar of 1812 →

Buy Alexander the Great essay paper online

Alexander the Great is one of the most mesmerizing characters in human history. Even though he was the son of a ruler and took over an empire that included the majority of the Greek city-states, Alexander's own conquests are what have made him admired, followed, libeled, and studied for over two millennia. Born in the year 356 BC at Pella, Macedonia, Alexander was the child of Philip II and Olympias. However, in 336 on Philip's murder, Alexander, approved by the army, took over without resistance. He at one time put to death the princes of Lyncestis, alleged to be behind Philip's murder, along with all likely rivals and the whole of the group conflicting to him. He then protested south, recovered a tentative Thessaly, and at a congress of the Greek League at Corinth was selected generalissimo for the imminent assault of Asia, already planned and instigated by Philip.

From his succession Alexander had determined on the Persian mission. He had fully developed to the initiative. Furthermore, he desired the Persia's treasures if he was to maintain the Territorial Army assembled by Philip and compensate the 500 aptitudes he owed. The utilization of the Ten Thousand, Greek military of affluence, and of Agesilaus of Sparta, in successfully demonstrating in Persian territory had exposed the flaws of the Persian Empire. With a superior cavalry power Alexander possibly would expect to overpower any Persian military. In spring 334 he traversed the Dardanelles, leaving out Antipater, who had previously devotedly served his father, as his subordinate in Europe with more than 13,000 men; he personally had dominion over almost 30,000 foot with over 5,000 cavalry, of whom virtually 14,000 were Macedonians and nearly 7,000 acquaintances propelled by the Greek League.

This military was to attest unexpected for its impartial merge of weapons. Much labor fell on the poorly fortified Cretan, Agrianian javelin men and Macedonian archers, and the Thracians. But in inclined battle the outstanding power was the cavalry, and the nucleus of the military, should the subject still stay unsettled after the cavalry accusation, was the infantry phalanx, 9,000 well-built, equipped with 13-foot shields and spears, and the 3,000 men of the noble battalions, the hypaspists. Alexander's assistant was Parmenio, who had won himself a foothold in Asia Minor for the period of Philip's life; scores of his relatives and followers were fixed in places of accountability. The military was escorted by scientists, court officials, surveyors, architects, engineers and historians; from the commencement Alexander appears to have envisioned an infinite operation.

In the year l78l, a French researcher called Nicolas Beauzee, who was the escritoire to the Count d'Artois, as well as a brother of Louis XVI, articulated the certainty that Alexander the Great "had no other motive than his own vanity, no right on his side other than that he could seize with his sword, no rule other than that dictated by his passions, and no virtue other than a violent and often thoughtless daring". The main perception through which both Plutarch and Aman differentiate and portray Alexander is 'virtue'. Declaration is made and admiration given initially and foremost to bravery, high-mindedness, self-discipline and his bigheartedness.

During his short existence, these virtues were fetched collectively as never before in a particular being. The hero religious group (cult) recognized these qualities and aptitudes even in Alexander's upbringing. Plutarch wrote: "But while he was still a boy his self-restraint showed itself in the fact that, although he was impetuous and violent in other matters, the pleasures of the body had little hold upon him and he indulged in them with great moderation, while his ambition kept his spirit serious and lofty in advance of his years". He possessed immense good will and appreciation, rather esteem.

The unexpected death of Alexander left his generals devoid of any arrangement whereby the enormous territories he had subjugated should be governed. A number of his supporters, as well as the rank and file of the Macedonian military, wanted to safeguard the territory. However the generals desired to disintegrate the kingdom and construct realms for themselves. It took more than 40 years of great effort and conflict (323-280 BC) before the split kingdoms were engraved out.

Finally three main dynasties surfaced: the Ptolemies in Egypt, the Palestine, the Seleucids in Asia, Asia Minor, as well as the Antigonids in Greece and Macedonia. These empires got their names from three generals of Alexander: Ptolemy, Antigonus and Seleucus. To be precise, since Alexander the Great had not specified the heir of his empire, he left behind an empire that was still fragile and incomplete. Many people were assassinated, there were numerous fights over leadership of the empire and even Perdiccas was so power ambitious that he would even generate a deceitful will to convince Alexander's territorial army.
Antigonus I Monophthalmus (also known as one-eyed) was one of Alexander the Great's mainly significant generals, and one of the most competent of his heirs. He came nearer than any of his colleagues to bringing back together Alexander's territory throughout the wars of the Diadochi (heirs), ultimately falling to an alliance that saw most of his fellow successors join up against him. Antigonus I was the child of a Macedonian nobleman, and a senior officer in the military that Alexander guided into Asia in 334 BC.

In the repercussion of Alexander's decease (323 BC), Antigonus settled in Phrygia. In the arrangement of the empire agreed at Babylon, he held his open positions, and was specified with the responsibility of supporting Eumenes of Cardia expansion detention of Cappadocia, Paphlagonia, as did his nearby satraps. A rebellion in Greece (also known as Lamian War) prohibited the satraps of western Asia Minor from assisting Eumenes, but Antigonus basically chose not to lend a hand. In its place, Perdiccas, the regent of the kingdom, took on the commission. Immediately after Eumenes attained safety in his satrapy, Perdiccas went to Antigonus, telling him to give an explanation for his satrapy. Antigonus, conscious that this was the predecessor to an assault on him, opted to runaway to Antipater in Macedonia.

The consequential disagreement (also known as the First Diadoch War) resulted in two of the most imperative of Alexander's heirs massacred - Perdiccas exterminated by his multitudes and Craterus in battle. As a result of all this, Antigonus was given power of the Royal Army in Asian regions (in the year 321 BC) and structured to overcome Eumenes of Cardia, who had been destined as a devotee of Perdiccas. This movement occupied him in the era between the First and Second Diadoch Wars. He obligatorily pushed Eumenes back into the regions of the east of Asia Minor, and then beleaguered him in the stronghold of Nora.

The Second Diadoch War was set off by the death of Antipater, the old regent of the kingdom in 319 BC. He elected another elder general, Polyperchon, to be his heir as regent, and this was the origin of an immediate catastrophe. Cassander son of Antipater sought after the name himself, whereas Antigonus did not desire an additional strong adversary to surface.
His initial move was a clear mistake. He presented to eradicate the obstruction off Nora if Eumenes would concur to adhere with him in the combat against Polyperchon. Eumenes approved to this, was unrestricted, and then changed sides yet again, forming an amalgamation Polyperchon with the description of general of the military of Asia. The conflict split into two detached clashes. In 318 Antigonus compressed his opponent's task force at the Bosporus, separating Eumenes. Over the subsequent two years Antigonus hard-pressed Eumenes more further to the east, throughout Asia Minor, into the regions Phoenicia and into Persia. Eumenes usually had the superior of their skirmishes, scooping a slight conquest at Paraetacene in 317 and assert a draw at Gabiene in 316. However, at Gabiene Antigonus saw a chance to capture his adversary's belongings, and in the result of the conflict Eumenes' military traded him to Antigonus in exchange of the return of their property.

This placed Antigonus in a very influential position. He now controlled the largest part of Alexander's empire in Asia, excluding Egypt. Throughout 316-5 he embarked on substituting accessible satraps with his individual followers. He also had admission to the treasuries of region of Susa, Persepolis including Persia at Ecbatana, getting hold of 25,000 aptitudes to sponsor his armed forces. In the end, he turned on Seleucus, the satrap of Babylon. In response of Perdiccas's proceedings against him, Antigonus prearranged Seleucus to demonstrate accounts for his satrapy. Seleucus escaped to Ptolemy in Egypt, where he alerted Antigonus's enemies about his ambition.

The aftermath of this triumph saw Antigonus finally take a critical stride, and seized the name of King (also basileus). Whereas Alexander IV had been living the heirs had preserved the concept that they were leading in his name. By the year 306 the youthful emperor had been said to be dead for almost four years but the arrest of Cyprus was Antigonus's initial apparent achievement since then. The transactions of the subsequent five years did not turn out well for Antigonus and Demetrius. They commenced with a main battering on Egypt, which was unproductive. The blockade was hoisted in 304 to enable them to deal with a sensitive intimidation from Cassander in Greece. Demetrius was propelled back to the mainland, where he imprisoned Acrocorinth, detained the Isthmus of Corinth, a greater part of Euboea and Achaea. In the year 302 Demetrius formed a fresh League of Corinth, and nearly beat Cassander, who litigated for tranquility. Antigonus, currently perhaps blinded by the viewpoint of overcoming Macedonia discarded this harmony proposal. The consequence was an alliance between different rulers like Cassander, Lysimachus, Seleucus as well as Ptolemy.

The fresh partners adopted a somewhat desperate arrangement. They effectively deserted Macedonia, and traversed into Asia Minor. Cassander and Lysimachus detained Antigonus in position while Seleucus transmitted his military from the east. As an alternative to transferring Demetrius into Macedonia, Antigonus asked him to come back to Asia. In the year 301 the two regions jointly met at Ipsus, in one of the biggest conflicts of the Hellenistic age. Demetrius led a victorious cavalry accusation, but then somehow got carried away in the expedition. Meanwhile, on the main battleground Seleucus's elephants broke Antigonus's army. Antigonus was murdered on the battleground, and Demetrius only just fled.

The demise of Antigonus broke the major segment of the Battles of the Diadochi. He was the very last of the heirs to make bringing back together of Alexander's empire the foundation of his policy. In the last year of his existence Seleucus could as well have an opportunity to reunite huge parts of the kingdom, but apparently it had not been his major goal. The death of Antigonus did not put an end to the career of his son. Demetrius went on and became king of Macedonia, before being overthrown after a period of never-ending warfare. Antigonus's grandson, Antigonus Gonatas, would also become king of Macedonia in the long run, beginning the Antigonid empire that ruled there until the period when Perseus was ousted by the Romans almost a century and a half later.

Buy Alexander the Great essay paper online

Related essays

  1. War of 1812
  2. Slavery Expansion
  3. Chesapeake Colonies
  4. Biography of Winston Churchill